Rollins v. Peoples Gas Light and Coke Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is undisputed that there is no private right of action under § 1681s-2(a).” (citations omitted)
• “Furnishers of information, such as Peoples Gas, are accountable under § 1681s–2(b) only if they continue to supply inaccurate data to credit reporting agencies after proper notification by the CRA.”
• “It is undisputed that there is no private right of action under § 1681s-2(a)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).