Skip to main content
· 9/18/1998

Rollins v. Glitsch Field Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 724 So. 2d 763
  • 1998 La. LEXIS 2712

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court erred because it did not refer to the needs of the child but merely restated the facts already known to DJJ without explaining why its reasons led to a different conclusion
  • holding that the trial court erred because it did not refer to the needs of the child but merely restated the facts already known to DJJ without explaining why its reasons led to a different conclusion
  • reversing where a trial court found probation inappropriate because appellant ran away from home and disregarded court orders but failed to make a finding regarding appellant’s rehabilitative needs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lemmon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.