Rollins v. Brown

Citations

• 37 S.C. 345
• 16 S.E. 44
• 1892 S.C. LEXIS 29

Syllabus

<p>1. Infant Parties in 1861.—Infants are bound by a proceeding for the sale of land in the Court of Ordinary in 1861, even if not served, where represented by a guardian ad litem, that being sufficient under the law at that time.</p> <p>2. Evidence—“Case”—Ouster.-—-Under action to recover an undivided interest in real property, an exception alleging error in rejecting testimony to show that defendant had paid large sums to the other adult distributees, overruled, because (1) the “Case” does not show that any such testimony was offered ; (2) it would have been irrelevant in this action ; and (3) there was no appeal from the ruling of the trial judge, on a motion for a non-suit, that there was no proof of ouster or demand.</p>