Rollins v. Bartlett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “section 211.447.7(6) does not expressly apply to findings of unfitness under section 211.447.5(6)”
• holding termination for parental unfitness appropriate due to lengthy incarceration that rendered the father unable to receive services or exercise visitation until his 5 later release
• listing numerous specific conditions affecting the parent-child relationship upon which the trial court based its finding of unfitness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).