Rollins International, Inc. v. International Hydronics Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a declaratory judgment requires an “actual controversy” with the following “prerequisites”: “(1) It must be a controversy involving the rights or other legal relations of the party seeking declaratory relief; (2
• considering the answer and counterclaim as well as the initial complaint when determining what issues had been placed before the court in a declaratory judgment action
• listing four factors that Delaware courts consider in determining whether a declaratory judgment involves an actual controversy
• adopting the “actual controversy” requisites articulated by this Court in Marshall v. Hill, 93 A.2d 524 (Del. Super. Ct. 1952)
• noting a purpose of declaratory judgment is to advance the stage of justiciability
• “We approve the prerequisites of an ‘actual controversy’ spelled out in Marshall v. Hill . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).