Skip to main content
· 12/4/2020

Rolling v. Kings Transfer, Inc.

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 5541

Syllabus

The trial court granted summary judgment in this personal injury action to each of three appellees. The trial court correctly granted summary judgment to one appellee-truck driver and his employer, because as to this truck driver, the appellant's injury was not foreseeable thus, this driver did not owe appellant a duty of care. The trial court erred by granting summary judgment to the second appellee-truck driver, because this driver owed appellant a duty of care, and there were unresolved questions of fact concerning breach of the duty of care, proximate cause, and comparative fault. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.