Rollin Paul Goodman, in His Individual Capacity v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the notice requirement under section 2675 is minimal, and a plaintiff’s administrative claims are sufficient even if a separate basis of liability arising out of the same incident is pled in federal court”
• noting that the agency’s denial of a claim on the merits was persuasive evidence that the requirement of minimal notice was satisfied
• describing FTCA notice requirement as “minimal” and confirming that a “skeletal” description of the alleged harm will suffice
• noting that the plaintiff “was not required to provide [the agency] with a preview of the details of his federal complaint, nor required to describe in more than minimal detail the factual predicate for his claim.”
• noting that the plaintiff “was not required to provide [the agency] with a preview of the details of his federal complaint, nor required to describe in more than minimal detail the factual predicate for his claim.”
• describing FTCA and enhance the remedies available to federal whistleblowers.” U.S. Gov’t Accountability Office, Whistleblower Protection: Additional Actions Would Improve Recording and Reporting of Appeals Data (2016

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).