Rollf v. Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the appellant failed to show prejudice when he “did not have the blood tested post-trial” and thus “has not shown that [blood testing] would have been favorable to his defense”
• “Mere speculation about what the evidence would have shown had it actually been obtained does not satisfy the requirement of showing [Strickland] prejudice.”
• “Mere speculation about what the evidence would have shown had it actually been obtained does not satisfy the requirement of showing prejudice.”
• because defendant “did not have the blood tested post-trial,” he “fail[ed] to demonstrate prejudice”
• evidence of victim’s membership in a gang
• evidence of victim’s membership in a gang

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).