Rollen F. Stewart v. District of Columbia Armory Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, in the context of a forum analysis, “identifying the government’s intent... raises inherently factual issues that cannot be resolved on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion”
• “[I]dentifying the government’s intent in this case raises inherently factual issues that cannot be resolved on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.”
• “We conclude that the question of whether RFK Stadium is a public forum is inherently a factual one.”
• “We conclude that identifying the government’s intent in Page 14 of 15 this case raises inherently factual issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).