Rolle v. Metropolitan Dade County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when calculating a statutory attorney’s fee, the present value of future benefits “is strictly a matter of proof to be established by evidence and expert testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Metropolitan Dade County v. Rolle
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-08-23· cited 3×
• Sistrunk v. City of Dunedin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-17

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lee Engineering & Construction Company v. Fellows
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1968-04-10· cited 100×
• Oolite Rock Company v. Deese
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1961-11-01· cited 22×
• Cone Bros. Contracting v. Gordon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-19· cited 19×
• Okaloosa County Gas Dist. v. Mandel
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-02-06· cited 15×
• Samurai of the Falls, Inc. v. Sul
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-12· cited 12×
• Williams v. Delta Upsilon Fraternity
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-01-11· cited 8×
• Tri-State Motor Transit Co. v. Judy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-06· cited 8×
• SCHOOL BD. OF COLLIER CTY. v. Salter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-16· cited 7×
• DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERV./DIV. OF BLIND SERVICES v. Bean
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-08-05· cited 7×
• Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Porter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-08· cited 6×
• Locke v. Rooney
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-02· cited 4×
• Von Hartman v. Publix Supermarkets
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-16· cited 1×