Skip to main content
· 1/13/2004

Role Models Amer Inc v. White, Thomas

Citations

  • 353 F.3d 962
  • 359 U.S. App. D.C. 237
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 350
  • 2004 WL 51103

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a lawyer should not “lump together multiple tasks” when billing because this practice “mak[es] it impossible to evaluate their reasonableness”
  • deducting hours where “one attorney’s records indicate that he or she spent time meeting with another attorney, while the second attorney’s records report no such meeting”
  • court must “determine with a high degree of certainty that such hours were actually and reasonably expended”
  • “Duplication of effort is another basis on which the hours seem excessive.” (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “Duplication of effort is another basis on which the hours seem excessive.” (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “[C]ourts properly have required prevailing attorneys to justify the reasonableness of the requested rate or rates.” (quoting Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 896 n.11 (1984)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Rogers, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.