· 1/13/2004
Role Models Amer Inc v. White, Thomas
Citations
- 353 F.3d 962
- 359 U.S. App. D.C. 237
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 350
- 2004 WL 51103
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a lawyer should not “lump together multiple tasks” when billing because this practice “mak[es] it impossible to evaluate their reasonableness”
- deducting hours where “one attorney’s records indicate that he or she spent time meeting with another attorney, while the second attorney’s records report no such meeting”
- court must “determine with a high degree of certainty that such hours were actually and reasonably expended”
- “Duplication of effort is another basis on which the hours seem excessive.” (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted)
- “Duplication of effort is another basis on which the hours seem excessive.” (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted)
- “[C]ourts properly have required prevailing attorneys to justify the reasonableness of the requested rate or rates.” (quoting Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 896 n.11 (1984)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Rogers, Tatel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.