District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/26/1996
Roldan v. State
Citations
- 676 So. 2d 1029
- 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6697
- 1996 WL 346981
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding defendant did not preserve challenge to costs where “defense counsel affirmatively indicated that he had no objection to the costs imposed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cope, Fletcher, Nesbitt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sutton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-22· cited 97×
- Norman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-15· cited 12×
- Tennie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-19· cited 11×
- Blanco-Diaz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-25· cited 8×
- Burdo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-31· cited 5×
- Beckford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-02-14· cited 2×
- Merrett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-13· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.