· 4/12/2022
Rolando L. Olivia Rodriguez v. the State of Texas
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- party seeking agricultural use exemption must show that majority of products for sale during primary harvest season are produced by him
- primary purpose of 5.5 acre property not agricultural where slightly less than one third of the premises had been cleared for growing
- “we agree with the trial judge that [the defendant] did not sustain his burden of proof that a majority of the products for sale [at the farm stand] were produced by him”
- operation of greenhouse and farm stand enjoined where agricultural use was not primary use of parcel, and where trial judge found only small percentage of produce and flowers sold at farm stand was produced on property
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.