Skip to main content
· 12/12/1994

Roland T. Ingels v. Thiokol Corporation

Citations

  • 42 F.3d 616
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34714
  • 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,419
  • 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1058
  • 1994 WL 694330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating purpose of limiting the court action to matters reasonably noticed in the EEOC claim was (1) to give employer notice of alleged violation and (2) to give EEOC opportunity to conciliate the claim
  • Administrative exhaustion in discrimination cases “(1) . . . give[s] notice of the alleged violation to the charged party; and (2) . . . give[s] the EEOC an opportunity to conciliate the claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brorby, Mewilliams, Ebel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.