· 5/21/2024
Roland Davis v. the State of Texas
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- citing, inter alia, State v. LeVasseur, 1 Haw. App. 19, 29, 613 P.2d 1328, 1335 (1980) (\[W]e point out that under [HRPP Rule 35] it is open to the court below to reduce the sentence within ninety (90) days of the receipt of our mandate if it sees fit.\) (emphasis added)
- “Under HRS § 806-73, then, the [pre-sentence reports] are manifestly subject to restricted dissemination, and are not to be made available for all to use.”
- reviewing the factors judges must consider in imposing a sentence
- upholding trial judge's imposition of consecutive sentences
- justification of a criminal sentence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.