Roland A. Jones v. The State of Georgia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “exceptions” to this “generally preferable approach” exist when a plaintiffs claim has no plausible foundation or is clearly foreclosed by Supreme Court precedent
• noting that “exceptions” to this “generally preferable approach” exist when a plaintiff’s claim has no plausible foundation or is clearly foreclosed by Supreme Court precedent
• noting that “exceptions” to this “generally preferable approach” exist when a plaintiff’s claim has no plausible foundation or is clearly foreclosed by Supreme Court precedent
• “When a district court has pending before it both a 12(b)(1) motion and a 12(b)(6) motion, the generally preferable approach, if the 12(b)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).