Rojas v. Vitale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting policy containing “risk of direct physical loss involving collapse” language and concluding that “[a] condition of impending collapse is insufficient”
• interpreting policy containing “risk of direct physical loss involving collapse” language and concluding that “[a] condition of impending collapse is insufficient”
• “There must have been a falling down or collapsing of a part of a building. A condition of impending collapse is insufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).