Rojas v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing conviction based on discovery violation despite finding that violation was inadvertent
• “When a defendant claims that the State has violated the rules of discovery, the trial court must first determine whether there was a discovery violation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lynch v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-07· cited 3×
• Pickel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-08-12· cited 3×
• Dawson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-04-08· cited 1×
• Daniel Scott v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-11-17· cited 1×
• Feast v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-08-08· cited 1×
• Picked v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-08-12· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Richardson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1971-03-31· cited 927×
• State v. Schopp
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-03-23· cited 199×
• Cox v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-05-23· cited 85×
• State v. Coney
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1974-04-17· cited 34×
• Rutherford v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-07-23· cited 14×
• Whites v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-19· cited 5×
• Scipio v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-01-23· cited 3×