Skip to main content

Rojas v. State

Citations

  • 171 S.W.3d 442
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 5611
  • 2005 WL 1690607

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deeming a witness’s opportunity to view the criminal act as sufficient
  • “[W]hen an in-court identification is based upon knowledge independent from the allegedly improper pre-trial procedure, it is admissible.”
  • “[W]hen an in-court identification is based upon knowledge independent from the allegedly improper pre-trial procedure, it is admissible.”
  • testimony of the jurors and the alternate juror rebutted any allegations of harm resulting from alternate juror remaining in the jury room during deliberations for fifteen minutes
  • testimony of the jurors and the alternate juror rebutted any allegations of harm resulting from alternate juror remaining in the jury room during deliberations for fifteen minutes
  • testimony of the jurors and the alternate juror rebutted any allegations of harm resulting from alternate juror remaining in the jury room during deliberations for fifteen minutes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kem Thompson Frost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.