District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/5/1989
Rojas v. KLOSTER CRUISE, A/S
Citations
- 550 So. 2d 59
- 1989 WL 101300
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying federal inquiry to question of propriety of exercising jurisdiction on defendants whose ship operated exclusively out of Miami
- applying federal inquiry to question of propriety of exercising jurisdiction on defendants whose ship operated exclusively out of Miami
- overwhelming economic and commercial contacts between the vessel and its owner and the United States require the application of American law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwartz, C.J., and Hubbart and Baskin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Acosta v. Norwegian Cruise Line, Ltd.S.D. Florida· 2003-12-12· cited 10×
- Tananta v. Cruise Ships Catering & Services Int'l., N.V.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-22· cited 7×
- Guerra v. Selsdon Maritime Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-27· cited 6×
- Royal Caribbean Cruises v. PayumoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-20· cited 3×
- Haave v. Tor Husfjord Shipping A/SDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-12-21· cited 1×
- Tananta v. CRUISE SHIPS CATERING AND SERV.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-22· cited 1×
- Dolphin Cruise Line, Inc. v. BozisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-06
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court· 1953-02-09· cited 1,206×
- Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court· 1953-05-25· cited 851×
- Hellenic Lines Ltd. v. RhoditisSupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 385×
- Aston Bartholomew v. Universe Tankships, Inc.Second Circuit· 1959-01-09· cited 142×
- Feist v. Luzerne County Board of Assessment AppealsSupreme Court· 1977-02-22· cited 135×
- Maiter v. Chicago Board of EducationSupreme Court· 1981-04-20· cited 95×
- Alexander Chiazor v. Transworld Drilling Company, Ltd.Fifth Circuit· 1981-06-23· cited 89×
- Maria Dracos, as Administratrix of the Estate of Nicholas Dracos, Deceased v. Hellenic Lines, Limited, a CorporationFourth Circuit· 1985-05-09· cited 89×
- Romano v. Department of Public Works & BuildingsSupreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 86×
- Bruce A. Bailey, as Special Administrator for the Estate of Joseph Roman Buenaflor, Deceased v. Dolphin International, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1983-02-17· cited 75×
- Waring v. Kalgrad Navigation Co.Supreme Court· 1981-10-05· cited 75×
- Sigalas v. Lido Maritime, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1985-11-26· cited 59×
- Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Fifth Circuit· 1984-04-05· cited 57×
- Bethilda Betty Phillips, Widow and Personal Representative of Walter Phillips, Deceased v. Amoco Trinidad Oil Company, and Santa Fe Drilling CompanyNinth Circuit· 1980-11-19· cited 56×
- Elena Jerezano Moncada, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Arturo Moncada, Deceased v. Lemuria Shipping Corp.Second Circuit· 1974-01-21· cited 43×
- Panagangelos Antypas v. Cia. Maritima San Basilio, S. A.Second Circuit· 1976-08-02· cited 43×
- David Nicol v. Gulf Fleet Supply Vessels, Inc., in PersonamFifth Circuit· 1984-10-09· cited 31×
- Pavlou v. Ocean Traders Marine CorporationS.D. New York· 1962-03-27· cited 29×
- Mattes v. National Hellenic American Line, S. A.S.D. New York· 1977-01-24· cited 26×
- Hellenic Lines Limited and Universal Cargo Carriers, Inc. v. Zacharias RhoditisFifth Circuit· 1969-07-03· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.