Rojas v. Aponte-Roque

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a corporate officer could be individually liable for unfair competition and false advertising
• noting that such acts have included, inter alia, torts, unfair competition and trademark infringement
• noting that authorizing and approving acts of unfair competition constitute actual participation
• noting that authorizing and approving acts of unfair competition constitute actual participation
• finding corporate officer liable where the officer “authorized and approved” the actions at issue in the case
• finding defendant’s own testimony that his duties as president of a corporation, including “arrangements of marketing services” and “distribution for the banks,” demonstrated actual participation in the wrongful acts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).