Skip to main content
· 5/2/2014

ROIG, ELVIN, PEOPLE v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Defendants who fire or refuse to hire attorneys even after being warned that they may be required to proceed pro se if they continue their dilatory conduct, for instance, may be deemed to have validly waived their right to counsel.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.