Rohrer v. Cunningham
Citations
- 138 Pa. 162
- 20 A. 872
- 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1252
Syllabus
<p>(a) A tenant sold an organ, and thereupon the purchaser leased it to the tenant’s daughter. The tenant informed the landlord of the sale and lease, and obtained a release from the latter of all claim to the organ:</p> <p>1. The notice of the ownership, given by the tenant to the landlord, was sufficient under the act of May 13, 1876, P. L. 171, to exempt the organ from distraint and sale for rent subsequently accruing.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that because the claimant’s “actual daily duties do not require him to work from the [Pennsylvania] office” his employment cannot be said to be principally localized in Pennsylvania
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Cueiam, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.