Rohr Aircraft Corp. v. Rubber Teck, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “information regarding any release of [insurer’s] obligations under the policy” exceeds the scope of Rule 26(a)(1), “which only mandates the production of agreements that may create on obligation on [insurer’s] part, not any agreements that may negate such an obligation”
• “Not surprisingly, there is no published case law defining specifically what insurance information must be produced . . . .”
• “Not surprisingly, there is no published case law defining specifically what insurance information must be produced pursuant to [the initial disclosure rule], and what is not required”
• the initial disclosure rule requires “the disclosure of an insurance policy that gives rise to an insurer's obligation to indemnify or hold its insured harmless for a judgment….”
• initial disclosure rule did not require insurer to disclose release or settlement agreements with defendants regarding insurer’s obligations or liability under the policy or documents setting forth the amount of the policy remaining
• rule “merely requires the disclosure of an insurance policy or other agreement that gives rise to an insurer’s obligation to indemnify or hold its insured harmless for a judgment, and does not require the production of all agreements related to insurance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).