Rohm & Haas Electronic Materials, LLC v. Electronic Circuits Supplies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “a loss of customers (or customer goodwill) do[es] not necessarily constitute irreparable injury”
• explaining that “a loss of customers (or customer goodwill) do[es] not necessarily constitute irreparable injury”
• explaining that “when courts are faced with affidavits at odds and must make a credibility determination between them, courts generally do not issue a preliminary injunction, but rather leave the issue for a jury to resolve”
• explaining that “when courts are faced with affidavits at odds and must make a credibility determination between them, courts generally do not issue a preliminary injunction, but rather leave the issue for a jury to resolve”
• when “courts are faced with affidavits at odds and must make a credibility determination between them, courts generally do not issue a preliminary injunction, but rather leave the issue for a jury to resolve.”
• “[W]hen courts are faced with affidavits at odds and must make a credibility determination between them, courts generally do not issue a preliminary injunction, but rather leave the issue for a jury to resolve.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).