Rohm & Haas Company v. Crystal Chemical Company and Joe C. Eller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing award of appellate fees under the Patent Act where “the appeal itself is exceptional”
• “Cases decided under §285 have noted that ‘the substitution of the phrase “in exceptional cases” has not done away with the discretionary feature’ ”
• “We construe the language of § 285 as applicable to cases in which the appeal itself is ex- ceptional . . . .”
• “We construe the language of § 285 as applicable to cases in which the appeal itself is ex- ceptional . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).