· 12/20/1990
Rohlfing v. Second Judicial District Court
Citations
- 803 P.2d 659
- 106 Nev. 902
- 1990 Nev. LEXIS 164
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that, under the Nevada Constitution and NRS 3.220, district judges lack jurisdiction to review acts of other district judges
- illustrating that a true example of conflicting jurisdiction arises when one district court judge, equal in jurisdiction to another, attempts to overrule another district judge’s prior determination purporting to nullify the force and effect of the prior judge’s decision
- “The district courts of this state have equal and coextensive jurisdiction; therefore, the various district courts lack jurisdiction to review the acts of other district courts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.