Skip to main content
· 5/27/1889

Rohland v. Rooke

Citations

  • 127 Pa. 139
  • 17 A. 805
  • 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1095

Syllabus

<p>Where, in a sheriff’s interpleader, it was found that the claimant of the properly, grain, stock, implements, which had been purchased at execution sales, left it with the execution defendant, who was made a tenant upon a farm rented by the claimant under an arrangement in good faith that the tenant should work the farm, keep up the property, and after taking out a support for himself and family turn over the surplus to the claimant, the transaction was not a fraud in law or in fact upon the tenant’s creditors.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • when Auditors’ report finds impropriety in an officer’s accounts, it is the officer’s burden to establish their validity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Collum, Green, Paxson, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.