Rohe Ex Rel. Rohe v. CNA Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding business automobile policy issued to a corporation did not provide uninsured motorist coverage for owner’s son
• holding business automobile policy issued to a corporation did not provide uninsured motorist coverage for owner's son
• “However, a policy term is not ambiguous because the term is not defined within the policy or because the parties can suggest creative possibilities for its meaning.”
• “In the instant case, the clear and unambiguous language of the policy defines ‘you’ and ‘your’ as the ‘named insured’ in the policy declarations. The ‘named insured’ is a corporation, not an individual, which cannot have ‘family members.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).