Rohbach v. Eckis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court abused its discretion when it did not terminate the father’s rights solely because the mother’s rights were not terminated, explaining that each parent must be assessed separately
• reversing the decree denying the termination of the father’s parental rights when it was based solely on the mother’s parental rights not being terminated
• reversing the decree denying the termination of the father’s parental rights when it was based solely on the mother’s parental rights not being terminated
• reversing the trial court in part, where the court had improperly “treated the termination Petitions regarding Father and Mother as inextricably intertwined.”
• “If [the Superior Court of Pennsylvania] would have reached a different conclusion on the record of a case, we may not re- weigh the evidence and the credibility determinations of the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).