· 4/28/1966
Rogotzki v. Schept
Citations
- 219 A.2d 426
- 91 N.J. Super. 135
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discovery proper as to whether during treatment there was to knowledge of defendant doctor, any diagnostic error by him or any other person
- in malpractice action it is proper in pre-trial discovery for plaintiff to inquire of defendant physicians as to their opinion and the exercise of their judgment
- in malpractice action it is proper in pre-trial discovery for plaintiff to inquire of defendant physicians as to their opinion and the exercise of their judgment
- discovery proper as to whether during treatment there was to knowledge of defendant doctor, any diagnostic error by him or any other person
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Goldmann, Foley and Collester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.