Skip to main content
· 4/28/1966

Rogotzki v. Schept

Citations

  • 219 A.2d 426
  • 91 N.J. Super. 135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discovery proper as to whether during treatment there was to knowledge of defendant doctor, any diagnostic error by him or any other person
  • in malpractice action it is proper in pre-trial discovery for plaintiff to inquire of defendant physicians as to their opinion and the exercise of their judgment
  • in malpractice action it is proper in pre-trial discovery for plaintiff to inquire of defendant physicians as to their opinion and the exercise of their judgment
  • discovery proper as to whether during treatment there was to knowledge of defendant doctor, any diagnostic error by him or any other person

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Goldmann, Foley and Collester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.