Rogondino v. Paolillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that two instances of confinement in cells with overflowing toilets and being forced to walk through ankle-high human waste was “simply too minor to state an Eighth Amendment claim”
• “[E]xposure to... waste [that is] intermittent or limited to a matter of hours” generally does not violate the Eighth Amendment
• “A Section 1983 claim will not le for prison conditions that are merely unpleasant. However, chronic exposure to human waste will give rise to a colorable claim.”
• inmate failed to state Eighth amendment claims when he was “exposed to waste only for brief periods; it appears that his total exposure was less than a few hours”
• inmate failed to state Eighth amendment claims when he was “exposed to waste only for brief periods; it appears that his total exposure was less than a few hours”
• inmate failed to state Eighth amendment claims when he was “exposed to waste only for brief periods; it appears that his total exposure was less than a few hours”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).