Skip to main content
· 2/8/1996

Rogic v. Mallinckrodt Medical, Inc.

Citations

  • 917 F. Supp. 671
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6096
  • 67 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,973
  • 1996 WL 91927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting plaintiff's claim that his termination within two years of reaching age 65, at which point additional benefits would accrue, satisfied element of intent where plaintiff was fully vested in benefits he had already accrued

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buckles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.