Rogers v. Stuart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that allegation that removal of barrier 22 readily achievable is sufficient for purposes of default judgment
• granting a default judgement for a 8 disabled plaintiff suing under the ADA and Unruh Act, relying upon this rationale
• granting a default judgement for a 27 disabled plaintiff suing under the ADA and Unruh Act, relying upon this rationale
• granting a default judgement for a 24 disabled plaintiff suing under the ADA and Unruh Act, relying upon this rationale
• granting a default judgement for a 6 disabled plaintiff suing under the ADA and Unruh Act, relying upon this rationale
• granting a default 3 judgment for a disabled plaintiff suing under the ADA and Unruh, relying upon this 4 rationale

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).