Skip to main content
· 1/6/1994

Rogers v. Stall

Citations

  • 200 A.D.2d 830
  • 606 N.Y.S.2d 412
  • 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the motion to dismiss may challenge specific portions or the entirety of a complaint and proceeding to review the merits of each challenged claim
  • observing that the motion to dismiss may challenge specific portions or the entirety of a complaint and proceeding to review the merits of each challenged claim
  • “A 22 failure to prevent discrimination claim is a derivative claim—a plaintiff cannot maintain a cause 23 of action for failure to investigate or prevent harassment unless there was actionable 24 harassment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikoll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.