Rogers v. Security Trust & Savings Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating where a necessary requirement for a compromise agreement is lacking, the agreement may not be approved
• holding “that the Attorney General and the trustee had standing” because “[t]he trustee has a legal obligation to defend the trust ... [and] [t]he Attorney General, likewise, has a duty to represent the beneficiaries where there are dispositions for religious and charitable purposes”
• stating “[t]he trustee has a legal obligation to defend the trust ... [and] [t]he Attorney General, likewise, has a duty to represent the beneficiaries where there are dispositions for religious and charitable purposes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).