Skip to main content
· 2/20/1896

Rogers v. Schulenburg

Citations

  • 111 Cal. 281
  • 43 P. 899
  • 1896 Cal. LEXIS 576

Syllabus

<p>Peeading—Joint Demurrer.—A joint demurrer is properly overruled, i£ the complaint is good against either of the parties demurring, though it may not be good as against one of them.</p> <p>Non-negotiable Note — Indorsement by Third Party — Guaranty — Expression op Consideration.—A third person who writes his name on the hack of a non-negotiable note becomes a guarantor thereof, whether the indorsement is made before or after delivery; and, under the codes, it is not necessary that the consideration of the guaranty be expressed in writing, in either case.</p> <p>Xd.—Presumption of Consideration—Burden of Proof.—A written instrument is presumptive evidence of a consideration; and the burden of showing a want of consideration is on the party seeking to invalidate it.</p> <p>Appeal—Findings—Conflicting Evidence.—The findings cannot be disturbed upon appeal, when the evidence is conflicting.</p> <p>Evidence—Declaration op Party in His Own Behalf,—The statements of a party, made without the hearing or knowledge of his adversary, are not competent evidence in his own behalf to prove the facts stated.</p>

Judges: Belcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.