Rogers v. Russell & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• drawing parallels between Ohio’s Public Records Act and the federal Freedom of Information Act and acknowledging that both statutes place the burden of proving that an exception to disclosure applies on the records custodian
• “Under Ohio law, a person asserting an exception is required to prove the facts warranting such an exception.”
• trial preparation records must be specifically compiled for litigation purposes to be excepted from mandatory disclosure under R.C. 149.43[A][4]
• “Under Ohio law, a person asserting an exception is required to prove the facts warranting such an exception”
• “Under No. 07-4436 FDIC v. Jeff Miller Stables, et al. Page 12 Ohio law, a person asserting an exception is required to prove the facts warranting such an exception.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).