Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1/8/2001

Rogers v. Rogers

Citations

540 S.E.2d 840
343 S.C. 329
2001 S.C. LEXIS 4

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that in light of the remand on the substantive matter, the issue of attorney’s fees was also remanded for reconsideration
holding Father's 21% increase in income, as compared to Mother's 8% increase in income, together with increased child care expenses warranted increase in child support
holding Father’s 21% increase in income, as compared to Mother’s 8% increase in income, together with increased child care expenses warranted increase in child support
relying on original financial declaration rather than other records. indicating an increased income in evaluating change of circumstances
finding increase in monthly child support was warranted based on evidence of father’s increased income
reversing the family court’s award of attorney’s fees where the award represented 16% of Mother’s annual income, and some of the beneficial results obtained by Mother in the litigation were reversed on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Toal, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.