Rogers v. Rogers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the portion of a pension distributed as marital property cannot also be considered as a source of payment of alimony
• \We hold that the trial court should have reduced the pension benefits to present value and awarded Mrs. Rogers a lump sum.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lauro v. Lauro
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-22· cited 15×
• Bain v. Bain
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-07· cited 6×
• Rogers v. Rogers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-08· cited 4×
• Eady v. Eady
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-09-17· cited 3×
• Hollinger v. Baur
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-10-07· cited 2×
• Carlton v. Carlton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-09· cited 1×
• Ascherman v. Ascherman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-28
• Westberry v. Westberry
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-17

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-06-26· cited 179×
• DeLoach v. DeLoach
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-21· cited 39×
• Cowan v. Cowan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-10-01· cited 25×
• Condren v. Condren
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-08-30· cited 13×
• Wolff v. Wolff
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-03-18· cited 11×
• McCauley v. McCauley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-17· cited 4×
• Corrie v. Corrie
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-03-08· cited 2×