Rogers v. Ritchie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claim was properly dismissed when the complaint “at most” made only “unwarranted conclusions about a defendant's actual knowledge.”
• “Because nonprecedential opinions do not establish any binding law for the circuit, they cannot be the source of clearly established law for qualified immunity analysis.” (citation omitted)
• nonprecedential opinions cannot be a source of clearly established law
• unpublished cases can’t clearly establish the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).