Rogers v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing both de novo review and appellant’s obligation to specifically assign and argue errors and limiting review to latter
• to be considered by appellate court, alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in brief of party asserting error
• to be -6- considered by appellate court, alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in brief of party asserting error
• “If the complaint on its face shows that the cause of action is time barred, the plaintiff must allege facts to avoid the bar of the statute of limitations and, at trial, has the burden to prove those facts.”
• Departmental Appeals Board Medicare Appeals Council decision
• Departmental Appeals Board Medicare Appeals Council decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).