Skip to main content
· 11/3/2006

Rogers v. Corbett

Citations

  • 468 F.3d 188
  • 2006 WL 3109371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Anderson promulgated a less categorical system of classification . . . . [a court’s] scrutiny is a weighing process.”
  • “A signatory must be a qualified elector of Pennsylvania who has registered to vote either on or before the day he signs the nomination petition.”
  • “[W]e conclude that Anderson sets out the proper method for balancing both associational and equal protection concerns and the burdens that the challenged law creates on these protection as weighed against the proffered state interests.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Aldisert, Roth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.