Rogers v. Cedar Van Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to consider defendant’s scope-of-search argument because defendant failed to address statutory language
• officer need not 9 specifically articulate statute authorizing search if an objectively reasonable officer could rely on a statute
• officer need not 9 specifically articulate statute authorizing search if an objectively reasonable officer could rely on a statute
• specifically noting defendant did not argue the search was outside his immediate presence or the statute’s permissible physical scope
• testimony that search was “incident to arrest” sufficient basis to apply good-faith analysis; not necessary to recite the statute
• officer need not specifically articulate statute authorizing search if an objectively reasonable officer could rely upon a statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).