Rogers v. Burberidge's Committee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• excluding “expert testimony that is inconsistent with the Court’s claim construction [as] unreliable and unhelpful to the finder of fact”
• “[T]he individuals Dr. Cornell relies on have been deposed and will be available to testify at trial. Kraft’s motion is therefore DENIED.” (internal citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).