Rogers Refrigeration Co. v. Pulliam's Garage, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under the Maryland Automobile Repair Facilities Law, “we have a clear legislative intention expressed to extend the protection of the ARFL to commercial users and not to limit them to the class of persons entitled to benefit, from- the [CPA]”
• failure to give customer notice of rights as required by the Automotive Repair Facilities Law was inconsequential and did not excuse payment for auto repairs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).