Rogers Electric Co. v. Kouba

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Board’s finding was not supported by testimony of either doctor who testified
• presumption applicable to question whether employee’s back injury was the result of a congenital condition or a work related accident
• “the Board’s decision [that the injury was not work related] was not supported by the ‘substantial evidence' necessary to rebut the statutory presumption of coverage”, since “there was no clear-cut testimony at all indicating lack of causation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).