Rogers, Cosandra v. Ingersoll Rand Co

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that the de- fendant “may have been entitled to a less sweeping instruction” but concluding that “[t]he district court was under no obligation to tinker with the flawed proposed instruction until it was legally ac- ceptable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).