Skip to main content
· 8/13/1991

Rogers by and Through Standley v. Retrum

Citations

  • 825 P.2d 20
  • 170 Ariz. 399

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging policy considerations affecting determination as a matter of law that there was no negligence on the part of a school district in not having a closed campus
  • acknowledging policy considerations affecting determination as a matter of law that there was no negligence on the part of a school district in not having a closed campus
  • describing two causation elements as cause-in-fact and foreseeability or proximate cause
  • defendant high school and defendant teacher did not subject plaintiff student to unreasonable risk of vehicular injury by permitting unsupervised egress from campus during school day
  • “The first question in a negligence case is whether the defendants owed a duty to the plaintiff.”
  • “A jury will not be permitted to require a party to take a precaution that is clearly unreasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fidel, Lankford, McGregor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.