Roger Mayweather v. Charles C. Foti, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an occasional missed dose of medication does not, without more, constitute deliberate indifference
• concluding that occasionally missed doses of medicine “fall far short” of establishing deliberate indifference
• “Continuing back pain is unpleasant. Its existence does not, however, in and of itself demonstrate that a constitutional violation occurred.”
• “Continuing back pain is unpleasant. Its existence does not, however, it and of itself demonstrate that a constitutional violation occurred
• finding that an inmate received adequate care, even though the treatment may not have been the best, and that any deficiencies in treatment were minimal; moreover, the plaintiff’s continuing pain, in and of itself, did not demonstrate that a constitutional violation occurred
• finding an occasional missed dose of medication does not, without more, constitute deliberate indifference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).